In that case, you have a few options. Everything from building a "poor man's" video wall, which is just a bunch of PC's with 2 or more monitors attached, each running it's own keyboard, mouse and monitor and a copy of the viewing client, all operating independently.
All the way to the other end, if you want a more advanced video wall solution like you see in security operations centers (SOC), where you have a rack of PC systems feeding into a video matrix processor with multiple outputs that lets you move displays around like you see on TV.
Some examples of systems here in the West are products like...
AMX
Christie
Cyviz a very good video wall system for the price
I'm not sure what is available or popular in your market area or what export restrictions there might be.
General rule is, depending on the size of the monitors, humans can only focus on 16 to at most 24 cameras on a monitor at a time. So for 150 cameras, that's about 7 monitors at least.
But it's not just about having a video card to throw multiple monitors on it. You need a video card that works for the system that you are using. And that doesn't mean just using any nVidia card for example. Some models work better than others, and it's not always about price and doesn't mean just a gaming card. Plus you need a powerful enough CPU to decode all those video channels for the displays. And not all software takes advantage of GPU decoding or does it very well. A lot spills over to CPU processing.
I've heard that Hik's software is not as efficient running lots of cameras and monitors for displays, so be prepared to add more workstations to spread the load if you find the ones you start with are having a hard time keeping up. Generally you don't want to exceed 50% to 60% constant CPU utilization per workstation.
1 found this helpful
thumb_up
thumb_down